The problem with emotion was that it was clearly something important, but-at least according to the old philosophy-it was something to overcome.
Scientists are always skeptics.
Isn't one of your first exercises in learning how to communicate to write a description of how to tie your shoelaces? The point being that it's basically impossible to use text to show that.
I think there is a tendency in science to measure what is measurable and to decide that what you cannot measure must be uninteresting.
A big ethical question is what happens after people stop using the device. Does it degrade the environment? Could it have been designed so it would actually be good for the environment?
Our information lives will be better served when we are free to get to our information from wherever we are, with any device available.
I prefer design by experts - by people who know what they are doing.
Everyday people are not very good designers.
Market segmentation is a natural result of the vast differences among people.
In my opinion, no single design is apt to be optimal for everyone.
You Think Want Product Also note that invariably when we design something that can be used by those with disabilities, we often make it better for everyone.
If you think the products don't match what you want from a product, don't buy it.
I an Apple bigot? No. I can critique their products and their customer service philosophy. But overall, they do better than any other player.
Readers always seem to think that the author has some control over the design of their books.
Sure, one can always get the students to relax and be happy - entertained, but although being laid back and relax can also lead to creativity, mostly it means that nothing much gets done.
Beauty and brains, pleasure and usability - they should go hand in hand.
You won't catch me giving clear lectures.